'Investigation on some forgotten WCK history'

[Daniel Fong]

Traditional Chinese version and Simplified Chiense version of the Investigation on some forgotton Wing Chun Kuen History for reading and downloading. It is more clear from sifu Wayne Yung because it is written in Chinese.

「探討一段已被遺忘的詠春拳歷史」中文版文章供閱讀及下載：

Traditional Chinese :

http://www.slideshare.net/ccwayne/sc...torytscwcykwaa

Simplified Chinese :

http://www.slideshare.net/ccwayne/sc...torysscwcykwaa

[dlcox]

While I found the article interesting, I also found it a bit lacking and haphazardly put together. This isn't meant as an offence or to say that it is agenda laden, just found myself asking more questions than could be addressed with the content put forth. For example there is not tangible evidence that says Fok Bo Chuen was taught by Law Man Kung, some legends state that he was taught by Lee Man Mao others by Dai Fa Min Kam. I agree that the relationship between Choy Lay Fut and Wing Chun is long and storied, but.... As for the reason that Wing Chun has been transmitted as 1 form, 3 forms and as San Sik has little to do with the Tai Ping rebellion. Realistically speaking if this were the reason couldn't we come to the assumption that the quickest way to train vast numbers in combat efficiency would be with short San Sik sequences? There are also the legends that the relationship between Choy Lay Fut and Wing Chun stems from Fut Gar, this is a connection constantly overlooked and rarely researched. All in all good try but IMO a lot of work still needs to be done before someone can step up and claim the throne of the oldest, purest, most original Wing Chun branch.