Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Wing Chun Training History Question

  1. #1

    Wing Chun Training History Question

    Gretings,

    I am not a Wing Chun man.

    I had the opportunity to observe some WC training over the years via u tube and something came to me recently that I had to ask about. Was the Wing Chun empty hand sparring originally start out as a way to safely train the usage of the Butterfly Knives?

    mickey

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Great Lakes State, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,645
    Some of the other Southern styles that were around before Wing Chun was conceived like CLF used the knives that could be contained in a single scabbard and easily concealed. Like carrying handguns instead of rifles. Close combat weapon like a tomahawk, these weapons were mandatory for survival. To watch the knife set is not so exciting, about like watching the pole set. Nothing flashy. No spinning or acrobatics. Nowadays to consider using the double knives in a pinch for their intended use is going to be questionable as long as there is available law enforcement as first response. Empty hand Wing Chun was developed specifically to minimize effort and maximize efficiency in confrontation where the use of weaponry would be deemed criminal intent. Wing Chun does not require the Butterfly Knives or the pole to be a complete fighting system. https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2&v=j5g-ssvZE7Q
    Last edited by PalmStriker; 10-07-2015 at 08:29 PM.

  3. #3
    Greetings PalmStriker,

    Thank you for your response. It did not address my inquiry.

    Wing Chun may have been one of those styles where weaponry was taught first. And if so, was the sparring method that we see originally done as a training method for knife fighting. I am talking about origins, here.


    mickey

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by mickey View Post
    Greetings PalmStriker,

    Thank you for your response. It did not address my inquiry.

    Wing Chun may have been one of those styles where weaponry was taught first. And if so, was the sparring method that we see originally done as a training method for knife fighting. I am talking about origins, here.
    mickey
    No, it was not.

    Origins are a murky and endlessly debatable topic. I'm not going there. But I will say that WC does not share key characteristics of weapons-first martial arts such as many branches of FMA, Eastern and Western historical swordsmanship and, in today's world, tactical firearms training.

    Weapon arts almost universally begin with weapons, or some safer training version of the same. Wing Chun does not. Weapons arts that branch out into empty hand combat, like many FMA and some Japanese arts with roots in swordsmanship, generally incorporate this both into their style's "history" and make reference to it in their training. This only happens very rarely in WC where you may use a stance or position from the long pole or BCD sets.

    Finally, if you look at WC's empty-handed training and "sparring" curriculum across a wide range of lineages, you will find that the focus is almost exclusively on methods that make sense with empty hands but not with weapons. Chi-sau is one example. WC stylists train sticking drills extensively. You do not stick with the BCD.
    Last edited by Grumblegeezer; 10-08-2015 at 12:28 PM.
    "No contaban con mi astucia!" --el Chapulin Colorado

    http://www.vingtsunaz.com/
    www.nationalvt.com/

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumblegeezer View Post
    No, it was not.

    Origins are a murky and endlessly debatable topic. I'm not going there. But I will say that WC does not share key characteristics of weapons-first martial arts such as many branches of FMA, Eastern and Western historical swordsmanship and, in today's world, tactical firearms training.

    Weapon arts almost universally begin with weapons, or some safer training version of the same. Wing Chun does not. Weapons arts that branch out into empty hand combat, like many FMA and some Japanese arts with roots in swordsmanship, generally incorporate this both into their style's "history" and make reference to it in their training. This only happens very rarely in WC where you may use a stance or position from the long pole or BCD sets.

    Finally, if you look at WC's empty training and "sparring" curriculum across a wide range of lineages, you will find that the focus is almost exclusively on methods that make sense with empty hands but not with weapons. Chi-sau is one example. WC stylists train sticking drills extensively. You do not stick with the BCD.
    Could one implement knives into chi sao? Smaller blades? Would it still work ? Does it make sense? Not to imply I disagree. I do not know but again I see similarity. Parrying, getting off the line of attack, sensitivity. Put a folder in your hands. Still work?

    Edit- Do you mean Wing Chun history ? Murky ? Seems odd if the art is say, only 300-400 years old. Why so much confusion on where, who and how it developed ?
    Last edited by boxerbilly; 10-08-2015 at 10:56 AM.

  6. #6

    Training methodology and mindset

    One should closely examine their training, drills, applications. If you train as if your partner's hand/fist is holding a knife it will greatly change your mental outlook when training. That being said, here would be one example of less-than-optimal thinking:

    Name:  sifu-kwok-at-the-swansea-seminar.jpg
Views: 344
Size:  48.8 KB

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by wckf92 View Post
    One should closely examine their training, drills, applications. If you train as if your partner's hand/fist is holding a knife it will greatly change your mental outlook when training. That being said, here would be one example of less-than-optimal thinking:

    Name:  sifu-kwok-at-the-swansea-seminar.jpg
Views: 344
Size:  48.8 KB
    Keith Hackney did something similar to Joe Son. In that situation it worked. If someone locks that on you , it is a pretty good way. I see your point if there is a knife in his hand. I guess you better do the damage and get it back quick. Also, is this a single handed version of that dummy demo vid I posted?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by boxerbilly View Post
    Keith Hackney did something similar to Joe Son. In that situation it worked. If someone locks that on you , it is a pretty good way. I see your point if there is a knife in his hand. I guess you better do the damage and get it back quick. Also, is this a single handed version of that dummy demo vid I posted?
    Hi boxerbilly. I'm sorry, I'm not sure when/where you posted the 'dummy demo vid'?
    My point is, most WC'ers don't consider training as if their opponent were armed with a shank (not picking on Kwok, he is just the first one I saw after a quick search, but his two teachers Chun and Ch'ing do this too so perhaps that is where Kwok gets it from). If that dudes right hand had a shank, Kwok (via the way he trains I'm guessing) just pulled it straight into himself. That was the point I was trying to make.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by wckf92 View Post
    Hi boxerbilly. I'm sorry, I'm not sure when/where you posted the 'dummy demo vid'?
    My point is, most WC'ers don't consider training as if their opponent were armed with a shank (not picking on Kwok, he is just the first one I saw after a quick search, but his two teachers Chun and Ch'ing do this too so perhaps that is where Kwok gets it from). If that dudes right hand had a shank, Kwok (via the way he trains I'm guessing) just pulled it straight into himself. That was the point I was trying to make.
    I see. I was focusing on something I know. ****, held a thought!

    By the way, thank you for answering my question about with knife.

  10. #10
    Greetings Gentlemen,

    Thank you for your feedback regarding my inquiry.

    Respectfully,

    mickey

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by boxerbilly View Post
    Could one implement knives into chi sao? Smaller blades? Would it still work ? Does it make sense?
    Actually, "sticking" sometimes works better with longer weapons. With the long pole there is chi-kwun. With longer swords, in HEMA, there is crashing in and working from the bind. Some systems try to stick to a knife, (passing drills and the like in
    some FMA) but most of the time you'll get cut.

    Wing chun has sticky-hands drills, sticky-legs drills, and sticky-pole practice. It isn't an accident that there isn't sticky-knife training.
    "No contaban con mi astucia!" --el Chapulin Colorado

    http://www.vingtsunaz.com/
    www.nationalvt.com/

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Great Lakes State, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,645
    Hey Mickey! Pretty much what grumblegezzer said, I havn't seen or heard anywhere in the lineages where the knives are taught upfront or hand combat is derived from their use. My own practice is a good bit derived from the use of a two handed sword (use of diagonal cut and cross-step to protect your back) but is not Wing Chun practice.
    Last edited by PalmStriker; 10-08-2015 at 03:05 PM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    768
    Could be wrong, but I thought Gulao/Kulo WC was 'built' off double knives. At least some people from that school are of that opinion.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Great Lakes State, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,645
    Checked into it and you are right to the extent that the high and low "Butterfly Palms" are in keeping with the same form/intent as if you were using the double knives. I can see this would be so. http://www.chusaulei.com/martial/art...les_gulao.html

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    768
    If so, I wouldn't be surprised. Many of the central and Northern styles are built on the spear.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •