Thanks Skip!
snip.......It is similar to a person writing a text on the taste of an orange. A reader, who has never tasted an orange, will only have a “belief” in what an orange tastes like according to what he understands from the text. But the person will "know" what an orange tastes like when he finally eats one for himself. When the orange is tasted directly the individual will compare the actual experience with what he read about it. In some cases he will think, "Ohhhhh! THAT is what he, the author, meant!" concerning some specific detail. While concerning other details he might think, "No! I don't agree with that!"
The individual who has just tasted an orange for the first time, will have a different perspective than a person who has eaten hundreds or thousands of oranges. And, of course, each individual will communicate their direct experience of the taste of an orange slightly differently. Some may like the taste, some may dislike it. Some will wax poetic about the taste of an orange, some may paint a picture, while others will be more objective or scientific in their manner of communicating their direct experience.
snip....And quite frankly....it is no big deal either!!! You may take it or leave it as you like. You might even think in disbelief...
"This is IT?" THIS is what the big deal was all about?"
Which, once again, is why Buddha said he did not attain a single thing when he became enlightened.