would anybody agree that gate theory is related more to bridge fighting, than more conventional boxing/striking?
I say this, because it is the bridge, trap or whatever sticky technique that you use that gives you advantage as you move to engage a gate.
Boxers and strikers who are very mobile will keep turning on you as you move laterally without any problem, as KC and Micky seem to be pointing out, they have a different perspective. Thinking orthodox and southpaw...
You have to wait for them is my experience.
I've seen another centerline technique that is interesting defense to side movement attacks, that being to pivot on the front foot, and tracking your opponent as they move like that.
I think the gate theory introduces a good strategic concept for any fighter. Find an advantage, build the advantage, then cash it in. Don't cash in every little advantage the second you get it. Its good to have savings.
Like -N- said, Pak Mei is the same. Thin end of the wedge. Get a little advantage, build it a bit then finish hard and relentless. Of course, its not that simple, but that's the idea.
In the perfect fight, you don't get hit, and he doesn't get up. Right?
Guangzhou Pak Mei Kung Fu School, Sydney Australia,
Sifu Leung, Yuk Seng
Established 1989, Glebe Australia