Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: Fascia Training vs. Bodybuilding vs. Weightlifting?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Huntington, NY, USA website: TenTigers.com
    Posts
    7,718
    Quote Originally Posted by faxiapreta View Post
    Then it would be different than most forms of contact activities. In which breath is forcibly exhaled on contact.
    .
    hmm. don't know about that. When you get hit, blindsided by a tackle, body check etc, you are not forcibly expelling air. You usually contract and hold your breath at impact on instinct. Just going by personal experience.
    "My Gung-Fu may not be Your Gung-Fu.
    Gwok-Si, Gwok-Faht"

    "I will not be part of the generation
    that killed Kung-Fu."

    ....step.

  2. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by TenTigers View Post
    hmm. don't know about that. When you get hit, blindsided by a tackle, body check etc, you are not forcibly expelling air. You usually contract and hold your breath at impact on instinct. Just going by personal experience.

    Most athletes will do a combination of tensing the musculature while doing a forcible exhalation if they are aware of a hit coming. Boxers often learn to do body shots while the opponent is inhaling vs. exhaling and also learn to exhale as part of taking and delivering a punch.

    My personal experience is that this combination of contracting the muscles while forcibly exhaling seems to work the best.
    Last edited by faxiapreta; 06-18-2011 at 02:22 PM.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,861



    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  4. #34
    My bet is, that, although I'm not aware of any research involving this, that the valsalva maneuver is better for strength activities, while the forcible exhalation is better for power activities (i.e. delivering a punch or kick) as well as for shock absorption.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,381
    Quote Originally Posted by faxiapreta View Post
    Proper squat technique = valsava maneuver = increased stability and support due to increased intra-thoracic pressure.
    this..............

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Posts
    1,392
    Quote Originally Posted by faxiapreta View Post
    Proper squat technique = valsava maneuver = increased stability and support due to increased intra-thoracic pressure.
    Thanks. I couldn't think of the **** word earlier
    It is better to have less thunder in the mouth and more lightning in the hand. - Apache Proverb

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    You body adapts, it adapts to the stress that it is put through.
    That is why the body changes and the degree of change is dependent on the degree of stress.

    Having done "internal" body work like the IW and "external" one like Sanchin and the typical "hard contact" that goes on in full contact MA systems, I can say that BOTH methods have merit, but that the "hands on direct" one done in FC gyms is quicker, though it can have some adverse side effects which are obvious because of the training.
    Both methods are preferred for a "well developed and complete" system.
    Strength building wise, the most effective and efficient methods is the typical ST protocols that we have with weights.

    RE: The Valsava maneuver-
    It is pretty natural to do when we, even the untrained, try to move or lift any heavy object.
    It is crucial for squats and DL's and even heavy overhead lifting.
    It is used in some forms of "iron body", but there are some dangers in using it that way - Holding breath and getting hit is never a good thing, but then again the valsava is NOT done to get hit that way, but to develop the "internals" so that if you do get hit, you have the added benefits of strong core along with the attributes of the typical "exhale when hit" training.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  8. #38
    I recently did a blog post on this

    http://www.freefitnessguru.com/blog/...-training/.php

    Basically most people either train body parts...

    Chest
    arms
    legs

    Or they train exercises...

    Bench press
    squat
    running
    MA


    But your body then has a weakness as it is designed to respond best to functional training.

    Anaerobic and aerobic are physiological fitness that the two types of training can provide.

    What the do not provide is anatomical fitness - joint development

    Really we should build a foundation of fascia training as well as anaerobic & aerobic.

    Then there is longevity of athleticism, less injury and greater development.

    I call it "Joint Centric Training"

  9. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by taai gihk yahn View Post
    fascia is generally non-contractile (CT does demonstrate sum contractile properties, but not in the way muscle does); it responds to mechanical force, mostly load over time, which alters the lines of tension along which fibroblasts lay down new cells; so you can have deformation of fascia / connective tissue which can limit mobility; you can also "train" it by loading it over time - yoga is an excellent and straightforward method of "aligning / realigning" CT - you don't need any new-fangled jingoisms...

    This is the most concise description of Iron Body/fascia training that I've read so far.

    Thank you.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by RD'S Alias - 1A

    I have easily beaten every one I have ever fought.....

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Skid Row Adjacent
    Posts
    2,391

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •