So nice to have a discussion on something other than Carl the Great.
Whip a challenge, mmm how about go to the kitchen and make a good tuna casserole.
So nice to have a discussion on something other than Carl the Great.
Whip a challenge, mmm how about go to the kitchen and make a good tuna casserole.
Yenhoi, I agree, and you would think they would be pretty basic but it is amazing how much it is neglected or ignored in general.
Hunt1, then why bring it up, would you like me too?
_______________
I'd tell you to go to hell, but I work there and don't want to see you everyday.
I agree with red5: fuc k you hunt1
strike!
Depending on stance, structure, motion and timing...a number of motions can be a single motion destroyer- a pak sao, a yin hand...
so many more- doesnt evn have to be a punch.
yenhoi small mind small vocabulary.
The answers give insight .Who understands,who doesnt,who parrots. Looks like you are out of crackers.
Red it has gotten so boring here its not your fault the forum has been hijacked you're just exercising your right to post.
For once, I am definitely stumped! Though I do make THE BEST tuna sandwich you'll ever have...Originally posted by hunt1
Whip a challenge, mmm how about go to the kitchen and make a good tuna casserole.
Andrew, good answer. Though fewer words would have made it a great answer.
1 move!
I'll see your one, raise you none, and call.
WCK just is. Don't need no stinckin (stickin?) movements...
RR
ok getting a little zen.How many moves are needed to teach the essence of the system. 1 punch may be the full expression but can you teach the system with just 1 punch?
I ask because for the last year or so I have been trying to find a way to teach the essence of WC to a group of very advanced martial artists. To give some background I am part of a group of martial arts instructors that get together on weekends w/o students around to learn other arts ,fight,spar exchange idea's etc. A good portion of the time is spent on WC. the desire is to learn the basics of WC without having to learn the whole system.It came to me this past weekend while teaching my 5 year old that I could teach the core of the system with a basic stance,2 steps and 6 hand techniques taught as a form. all hand motions are double motions each arm doing a different technique.
So how would you reduce the system to give advanced people an understanding and an ability to use the system or would you even bother?
Last edited by hunt1; 07-18-2002 at 01:44 PM.
It is not the techniques that make it Wing Chun, but the path itself.
Whippinghand could resume that to one single word.But he's not here anymore...Or is he?...
-Michel.
montrealwingchun.com
I say it doesn't matter how many moves but the essence is in the
''loy lau huy shuong lat sau jik jung'' w/o these principles you have W.C.
So is anyone including kicking in this 'essence', or not?
The essence of WC is its principles which are encapsulated in SLT. Kicking, punching, tan sao, bong sao are techniques to execute and make the principles become a reality.Originally posted by Rill
So is anyone including kicking in this 'essence', or not?
Defend where there is no attack; attack where there is no defense.
Attack is the secret of defense; defense is the planning of an attack.
Yes, but the question was how many moves - I'm not looking to provide an answer or discourse from my rather inadequate knowledge, I was simply hoping to point out that with all the talk of handwork and punches, it seems the legs were being left out of the equation.The essence of WC is its principles which are encapsulated in SLT. Kicking, punching, tan sao, bong sao are techniques to execute and make the principles become a reality.