Early on, it is difficult to know the wheat from chaff. The fact that a teacher can dominate students isn't in and of itself sufficient evidence of the quality of what is being taught, though often enough it's the benchmark applied. However, and especially very early in our work, it may be the only tangible evidence we have to go on. Over time, increasing exposure to others outside one's own school can help to provide a reality check, and keep us honest with ourselves.Originally posted by BeWater
I absolutely agree. However, isn't there a certain amount of faith (I don't mean that in a religious way) in one's sifu and in the system itself that is required? I mean, how can I really know whether something I've been told is valid or not?
Yes and no. False or misplaced confidence can be a liability and a hazard. It's also not much fun trying to undo improper habits built over years either, and well worth the trouble and patience to get off on the most solid start possible.Furthermore, does it even matter -- isn't it just as important that one has confidence in what they've learned?
There is a lot of good "advice" in the preceding posts. I would also suggest "be sure you have found the right teacher for you." Again, time and exposure will tell. Unless one lucks into it, finding a great teacher is easier said than done. And back to your point, till we know enough to make some reasonable assessments for ourselves, we need rely on a certain amount of faith and trust. Hopefully not blind faith though. The best learning requires us to honestly question and perpetually evaluate.
Some thoughts, anyway. Best wishes in your training, and enjoy the journey.
Regards,
- Kathy Jo
P.S. I am indeed hopeless, and more than likely depraved. Caveat emptor.