Hello,Originally Posted by XINDU
I would tend to disagree with this although the point is a valid one. Often it will be the person who attacks first who will win however that is not a given. There are countless examples of people struck and even shot who went on to disable or even kill their attackers. What is it that sets them apart? Perhaps the very mindset of never quiting and continuing to fight on no matter what. It is very true that you can receive quite a serious injury and yet still kill or disable your attacker. Don't believe me? Check it out for yourself and talk to some street cops or ER doctors. He who strikes first may have an initial advantage but he who fights hardest has the overall advantage.
Besides, there are serious legal ramifications for those who advocate striking first. While this approach can have its place, it is often not the best avenue from a legal perspective.
Peace,
Dave