Not why - how. If you are analyzing streetfights, you need to analyze that as well. There are many people on the WC forum who say that WC really isn't all that great from an offensive standpoint. they say the strongpoint is defense. Knowing this, you need to also be analyzing the position of the participants - were they chest to chest? did one blindside the other? if they had some distance, how did it get closed? if there were multiple attackers, where were they?
If you are REALLY into self defense, then you do also want to know why the fight escalated. You can determine measures you would have taken to de-escalate the situation before it got out of hand.
you CAN reason with animals - lion trainers and others have been doing it for years. we tame lions, horses, etc. we train monkeys and dolphins - everything has its language, you just have to understand it. An aggressor in a fight is no different. A lot of times, you CAN reason with him and de-escalate a situation, if you know how.
People speak about that blah blah percentage of the fight does this an that, everyone has their theories, a quick google search can show you the reality of fighting, its a study material for combat in the modern world.
sure. and now you are ANALYZING it, which means what? you are now theorizing based on what you are seeing on google. Theory is inevitable at some point for most people, as they don't get the actual experience.
i'm nobody...i'm nobody. i'm a tramp, a bum, a hobo... a boxcar and a jug of wine... but i'm a straight razor if you get to close to me.
-Charles Manson
I will punch, kick, choke, throw or joint manipulate any nationality equally without predjudice.
- Shonie Carter