Originally Posted by
tattooedmonk
Whatever the case maybe, these are GMS's translations and not DFW's.
I have the book.
Cool...
Originally Posted by
tattooedmonk
Funny that GMS's translations coincides with the 128 postures( there are more moves indicated in DFW's translation) and yet DFW's does not .
There's a reason for that.
Originally Posted by
tattooedmonk
GMS's is more detailed than DFW'S .
You think?
Originally Posted by
tattooedmonk
The only way GMS could have stolen it, is if DFW created it himself, which he did not.
Lau Bun brought the set with him to North America in 1922. He taught it until he died in 1967. DFW learned in the mid to late 60's from Lau Bun & his senior classmates. It's been performed in SF's Chinatown, Los Angeles, Maryville since Lau Bun arrived in pieces & completely. I've seen video of a teenaged DFW performing in 1967.
Originally Posted by
tattooedmonk
I think it help substatiate GMS's claim about the system.
How?
Originally Posted by
tattooedmonk
Why would GMS and DFW be the only ones who teach this form, yet both of them talk about how famous and well known a Shaolin form it is?
Marketing... I can name a handful of other CMA's off the top of my head that have their own version of Ng Ying. CLF has at least 3. Siu Lum Ng Ying Kuen (Shaolin Wu Xing Quan) is a generic name, but DFW put his book out first. First come, first serve.
Here's a better question... why does the SD version kinda look like DFW's?
Message: Due to the ongoing Recession, God has decided the light at the end of the tunnel will be shut off due to power costs. That is all.