I'm soooo bored...
I'm soooo bored...
LOL, the one good thing about having him on ignore is that I don't have to read his constant BS.
You guys that know me know my resume, its almost as long as my Johnson ,
Those that don't can ask and all is answered.
As for groin ache, the 2 points in my sig make everything he says the BS that it is.
Period.
Psalms 144:1
Praise be my Lord my Rock,
He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !
"BS" such as the fact that you need to have years of serious and dedicated training in an AUTHENTIC kung fu school before you make your "expert" comments on the subject?
And "BS" such as the fact that training in many different MAs makes you Sanjuro a jack of all trades and a master of none (eventhough I suspect that your kyokushin karate skills may be of a very good level.)!
Or "BS" such as your untruthful statements regarding my person? Perhaps even "BS" such as you hiding behind the "ignore" button when I called your lie?
Your "resume " means nothing in a KUNG FU forum! The world is full of MA instructors with long kung fu resumes who are ripping the pants off the unsuspecting MA enthusiasts.Originally Posted by Sanjuro_ronin
And I am sorry but breaking slabs of wood on YouTube , does not cut it either as far as your "kung fu reputation" is concerned, eventhough it would explain why you want people to know your real identity as so that they will refer to you by name when they say, "bravo, bravo for breaking that piece of wood".
No thanks as I have seen enough of your kung fu "resume"...lol.Originally Posted by Sanjuro_Ronin
You should have that problem of yours looked at. Didnīt they teach you robots anything about safe sex in the military?Originally Posted by Sanjuro_ronin
The 2 points in your sig are worthless just like your kung fu "resume"!Originally Posted by Sanjuro_Ronin
EXACTLY!Originally Posted by Sanjuro_Ronin
lol not lookin atcha, unless your a classy chick
it was my response, or rather the lack of words to describe my response to who mis understood forum postings can be. such as when hardwork thinks im kansuke's buddy because in a different thread i made a comment on how hardwork took kansuke's bait (implying he was baiting, you know like a troll ).
but sheesh, im a MMA guy and i didnt even know it. funny because i dont recall ever having been trained at any MMA gyms.
and as to the amorous rolling.....if your a classy chick....
personally, i never take any of this internet stuff seriously. its really mostly intertainment while im bored at work.
oh i glean the occasional bit of knowledge or information from guys here from time to time, which is nice.
ive never been worried about 'trolls' or 'flame wars' i usually just ignore it or insert a wanna be witty quip from time to time, or just laugh my arse off at the rediculousness of any rediculousness i see.
this is becoming quite the response, ill end now.
THE END
For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.
Lucas - thats ok. I'm not a chick. no amorous rolling with you please.
any classy chicks on this forum that would like to roll? I don't think good looking classy chicks ever attend those showdowns people organise. Too many of those and I suspect they probably don't look that nice anymore...
HW - thats ok. You can respond when you get a chance.
what?!? no classy dames on the forum? SAY IT AINT SO!!!
For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.
Let us take Wing Chun. I know for a fact that WC has more power than it is given credit for but when it is compared to certain lineages of Southern Praying Mantis, then it falls short as it lacks the type of body unity that some SPM schools develop.
I am not saying that WC does not have body oness/unity principles but only that they are different from some other styles of kung fu and as a result not as powerful.
Staying with Wing Chun, the fact that in this style one turns the stance to absorb force can be a disadvantage if applied against an opponent who is a good "listener" and/ or "sticker". Other styles of kung fu such as SPM, Five Ancester Fist, etc. will face the opponent squarely and will disipate his force by using hands/arms and even upper body shifting. This is faster and IMHO more "in your face"!
The student can have the meaning of the techniques explained to him as soon as he is performing them correctly while performing the form. This means that there is no point in teaching him applications if his stances are not correct and he is not delivering the strikes correctly.Originally Posted by friday
He should not be visualizing any applications while he is performing his form incorrectly. Initially his MAIN focus should be in the correct performance of the movements.
Probably what has happened to Sanjuro_ronin.Originally Posted by friday
Seriously speaking. I am against holding back if the student is worthy,dedicated and of GOOD CHARACTER. However not all students can be classified as worthy that means that in traditional schools there would be chosen disciples who would be taught everything while the rest would be taught the "standard" stuff.
The problem arises when the people who have not learned everything become "sifus" and then transfer their "knowledge" to the unknowing students. This scenario occurs because the said students decide to teach without their sifus´ permission or because the sifu gives them the permission to teach for financial reasons or just because he does not care less, knowing very well that the secrets of his given style are safe with him and his chosen disciples.
Is this right or wrong? The answer is "Yes".
I agree but again the sifu should make sure he is performing the techniques correctly to a good standard before he explains the applications.Originally Posted by friday
Well his experience serves to remind us all, specially the beginners that when we think we are ready for more or deeper instruction, we may well be mistaken.Originally Posted by friday
I agree that without learning the applications of one´s forms one is doing nothing but dancing, however I truly believe that the student must be able to perform his form to a good level eg. with strong stances and solid and flowing techniques before he is taught the applications.
Of course I do!Originally Posted by friday
The answers may be found in the core style (assuming that some of the MMA-ists really practise kung fu as their core style) but they are not to be found "so readily". I would suggest that many people opt for MMA because the results can be achieved relatively quicker. Also nowadays people seem to have shorter attentions spans, not just regarding MA training but also cooking/eating, TV, music and etc.Originally Posted by friday
Furthermore it is much easier to find a good MMA school than a good and authentic kung fu school. Plus the popular (among some) belief that kung fu does not work or is "lacking", doesn´t not help the case either.
I assume from where the rest of WC came from and that is Shaolin Kung fu.Originally Posted by friday
It is from before the popularity of BJJ.Originally Posted by friday
I couldn´t tell you personally because I haven´t trained that aspect of Siu Lam Wing Chun. However, sifu did participate in a friendly sparring session with a BJJ black belt in Rio (where his school is) without any conclusive results probably because they weren´t trying to kill each other.Originally Posted by friday
Probably. A better test would be a street fight, a real one.Originally Posted by friday
There was no point in fighting them, believe me! Besides, I ended up training with them for a year and I wish that I could have stayed there for the rest of my life. Now that was REAL kung fu!Originally Posted by friday
With the right (kung fu) power the reliability increases.Originally Posted by friday
With what I can only describe as unreal power, combined with a system that controls and visciously hits the enemy with the sole intention of visciously causing them concussion/maximum damage and/or breaking limbs, the risks don´t seem that high.Originally Posted by friday
You tell that to the many knuckleheads who post here as "kung fu" experts.Originally Posted by friday
I am not sure what you mean by that last remark. Suffice to say that there are a lot of secrets in kung fu which we ALL need to learn. You may have been exposed to some and I may have been exposed to others, but there are more, a lot more answers out there but one thing is for sure and that is that these secrets are not hiding in the local MMA gym.Originally Posted by friday
I will stick to realistic sparring, thank you. This is not to say that sports competitions are not sometimes benefitial, just that they are not the beginning and the end in MA training.Originally Posted by friday
I see your point and it has been made here before but again I believe that if you practice your kung fu style in an authentic manner then you will learn what is needed to learn. After which you may wish or not wish to test what you have learnt against every MA known to man.Originally Posted by friday
You are probably right as one can fight using one´s style before one becomes an expert but having said that we all have our own preferences and ideas about how and when to test our knowledge.Originally Posted by friday
Last edited by Hardwork108; 01-21-2009 at 06:33 PM.
its safe to say that I train some martial arts. Im not that good really, but most people really suck, so I feel ok about that - Sunfist
Sometime blog on training esp in Japan
I honestly say that it was a joke and not an insult, well maybe to all the dames out there, but not to you as I was just pulling your leg. You should relax a little.
"We" again? I think that you keep very bad company and I don´t mean just your ego, Id and Anima but also Sanjuro_ronin and Ikfmdc (I still can´t believe that even you would list them as forum friends) and Kansuke, for gods sake!Originally Posted by taai gihk yahn
That remark coming from the likes of you is actually funny and ironic in the light of the fact of I having exposed your lies (among other notable knuckleheads here) in the past including the ones in that stupid prank!Originally Posted by taai gihk yahn
Last edited by Hardwork108; 01-22-2009 at 08:11 PM.