Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2101112
Results 166 to 172 of 172

Thread: The Way Kung Fu Was Trained in Prior Centuries

  1. #166
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,863
    i thiunk in kung fu unsually strong is the same as "creme de le creme"

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  2. #167
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by bawang View Post
    in kung fu unsually strong is the same as creme de le creme
    I think you are missing my point, you need to "judge" a system and its training methods based on the AVERAGE practioner, not the exceptional ones.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  3. #168
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,863
    i know and i want to say standards need to impprove. if sifus dont depend on teaching kung fu for money too much then they can choose students more carefuly

    the problem also is those top super duper awesome elite people taught very few people and chose students carefully, there is no exceptional guy every single student was just as good, now days standard is low
    a style with many people noremal, a single family linage with thousands and thousands of students is rediculous
    and even with thousands of students, after 100 years the style has not progressed changed at all it has fossilized
    Last edited by bawang; 02-11-2009 at 08:12 AM.

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  4. #169
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Western MASS
    Posts
    4,820
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterKiller View Post
    Wu Bu Chuan was invented in like 1956.
    yeah and that was part of the joke
    Quote Originally Posted by Psycho Mantis View Post
    Genes too busy rocking the gang and scarfing down bags of cheetos while beating it to nacho ninjettes and laughing at the ridiculous posts on the kfforum. In a horse stance of course.

  5. #170
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveLau View Post
    Hardwork108,

    The book that I am reading was published in 2007. Both are written in Chinese. And they are much the same with regards to the tale of Master Wong Fei Wong, because the information comes largely from the same sources. The later one though has more coverage of the lineage's martial art detail. It would be good to have an English translation of the books published. So that more people can enjoy them.



    Regards,

    KC
    Hong Kong
    Steve Lau,

    Thank you. I will just have to wait and keep my eyes open for them. I am sure that they are both fascinating books to read.

  6. #171
    Quote Originally Posted by bawang View Post
    i think there is also a misconseption in kung fu that with skill can beat stronger openent. thats not true. the stronger man always wins. "10 pound more strength beats ten techniques" kung fu is brute strength
    I have also heard that. The example given to me was that no matter how technically skillful a child may be, an adult will always beat him in a fight.

  7. #172
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Midgard
    Posts
    10,852
    some of the best never taught or taught very little. then its like that in almost any culture. not all warriors choose to share, many take their skills to the grave.
    For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •