Problem of economics
Originally Posted by
kwaichang
I am sick of all this stuff. The point is now a renegade EMMullins has more area and control and he shouldnt have. Actually no {one} should. The fact that I for one cant train with the schools in Tennessee says that the open arms of MA brothers arent that open. So why didnt KY schools absorb them??? Well because they were associated with the Soards . That is why. I for one think the EM soard losing the schools is a good thing i think the EM should teach over an area but not have the right to say who trains with who and if you can open a school or not. this is not the case though. They are trying to control everything we do and say. KC
I don't understand the "I can't train" somewhere. But as far as opening a similar school very close, providing similar instruction in the same basic material, would be the school competing against itself. Both would be competing for the same "customer base," and since there are only so many of those, there would be less students at each, defeating the purpose. Unless you are Starbucks, you can't have the same product being provided right next to itself.
But, not being able to go there to participate? I don't get that -- unless it is a matter of you having to do it their way, in their school, which I guess is their right, isn't it? But another school, teaching the same (nearly) material, right next door (not literally)? Both would die.
Just One Student
"I seek, not to know all the answers, but to understand the questions." --- Kwai Chang Caine
(I'd really like to know all the answers, too, but understanding the questions, like most of my martial arts practice, is a more realistically attainable goal)