My comments follow with ++++
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sure you are right.
and sure everything is based on if the respected HS dont know anything, right?
well ask Jim about the scholastic nonsense Hendrik has speculate when he show what hendrik share with him to GM Fu last year. hahaha.
and make sure dont follow hendrik's speculation because what if hendrik is totally wrong and bsing everyone.
follow with your own risk. dont tell me I dont warn you here. hahaha
+++Now you are getting defensive. Your slipping from your "State". Keep things Clear. This isnt about Emie 12 jong and white crane being the parents of WCK. As that is something i accept. This is about how WCK should be trained, and how much comes from each parent. Beyond that, you have stated something. It was "WCK is meant to be Internal". Now i simple asked if you had actually trained the Emie 12 jong, learned it from a teacher, as well as applied those teachings to WCK, and had personaly validated your speculation with real time training and experiance. I have asked nothing unreasonable.
I dont care what Jim has to say about it. What i care about is if you have validated your mind speculation with realtime experiance. If you have, than it shouldnt be a problem for you to say, "yes i have trained it and thats why i have tried to share it" or you could say "yes im speculating but i "think" im right." - Because my real time training and experiance doesnt support your speculation. So, if your training in real time and experiance does support it, than perhaps you training is deeper and perhaps i need to renovate and would try your approach. But i wont play with my training without care and caution. Hence all i asked was if you had experianced it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"BUt when we say WCK needs to be practised a certain way or was practised a certain way by the ancestors, we need Experiance to know if thats true.
Than once you have attainment, you can help lead others down the proper path"-BS
sure, you are right logically.
The question is how can one know what is what before having an attainment? I dont question, I go with my sifu's teaching and always posting with Thus, I have heard. hahaha
+++So before you had attainment how did you "See" your sifus' teachings were correct?? What state where you in that you could verify his State?? You couldnt so you went on faith like me?
My sifus life mirrors mine. He practised a differant version of WCK, that was from HK. Things didnt make complete sence. He met Sum Nung, and saw and felt and had all the questions he had - nswered , and so changed systems. I have had the exact same experiance. I started the training via faith in his realtime experiance. He shared enough with me, that i saw the truth, and gave it a chance. I trained it. And have now developed, and have validated the teachings.
And there are numerous layers of "state". I have some attainment but its limited. As i see you are in. Slipping in and out. Not maintaining always. As the truth state, ego wouldnt exist.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is a middle path? please define in detail until then I have no idea what do you mean.
as for what is Snake powered Crane potential definition with specifics is up in the forum for reading.
As for hard, soft, internal, and external.. well ask Dr. Chow or others who is pioner in the internal art. they set the reference certainly not me.
+++You miss my point. Dr.Chow has 1 opinion of probably 10,000 on internal training. Is Wudang correct? Is Ermie correct? is Chan seng feng correct? Is esoteric buddhism correct? Taoism correct? TCM correct? All correct? None correct?
And i already explain "Middle path" -
its a core concept from the Iching. I would think you were familiar with it. Its avoiding extremes. Applied to training. Nothing more, nothing less. Doubtfull my words could convey the truth to you or anyone. Perhaps you need to try training it with a Sifu who follows it. The training would include Tendon training, along side breath, and Chi Work, as well as Programing in the initial stages or what you refer to as Soaking.
--------------------------
LOL. Ok i can stroke your ego, were friends. Yes - You shared the Emie "12 zhaung" White Crane fusion with me. And it was , i would say mind specluation on yours and Cho Hong Choi sifus part . Mind speculation isnt bad unto itself. Its simply not truth. It can be a valid starting point, which than needs to be validated with experianced and training, as many times Mind Speculation crumbles under the weight of truth. ------B
You see, I am sure love to have my ego boost, but then why do you have to follow my mind speculation ? I might be totally wrong and misleading.
doesnt make sense to follow some one's speculation right? hahaha
+++The answer to your question is in the above post. First i dont have to follow anything. I have already followed a path that has proven itself to me. You, have posted and made a statement. WCK is meant to be practised Internal. You than defined Internal as Activating the 8 special merridians and Breath and Chi work. I see nothing wrong with your speculation, as that is frequiently the starting point, your speculation may be from a point of clairity. I am willing to try something, if you actually trained it and know for a fact your speculation was correct. If not i wont gamble with my art.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
as I mention above, follow my mind speculation with your own risk? hahaha
+++Thanks for answering my question. Now i know to tread carefully.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sure, with the same logic as yours, if hendrik
study emei 12 zhuang formally with top name but his dan dien is not heat up and Could not handle/activate the Ren Du Mai, then hendrik has zero right?
+++Your experiance would either mean 1) You didnt train properly or long enough or 2)the teachings are not valid.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to the worse , if hendrik have not experience the basic Qi accumulation which is common to all Chinese internal art, and start to make lots of speculation about others right or wrong based on hendrik's self righteous view, that is even misleading right?
so, here again dont follow hendrik's bad habit. hahaha
+++Thanks for the help. Things are much clearer.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name dropping is pointless. But if someone asks - So you know WCK , who did you learn from ? and you say. From Sifu "" . Thats called polite conversation.
People also want to know why one is qualified to make statements. ITs normal - in all parts of life, we have to give our referances. True Name Dropping is ego based and more mind speculation---BS
True.
and also Depend on who is the audiance.
+++True to a point.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good point,
we are not directing this post about wCK to "I know" post right?
+++I dont know. Thats what my entire several posts were attempting to figure out. Instead of assuming i asked you. As "i know" only comes from attainment from correct practise.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Great idea.
I certainly miss your point.
IMHO, your point is certainly different then mine, See, I look at myself as just a beginer who isnot in the position to question that to Dr. Chow. I am just in the position of trying to learn as much from him if possible.
+++I definatly view myself as a beginer. But that has little to do, with asking your teacher if they actually have trained what they are trying to teach. Why would i want to learn from a swim instructor who has never been in the Water? Why is asking viewed as negative? This isnt the 1700s. We are allowed to question respectfully.
0----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"i see thy nose, but not what dog to feed it to" othello