i posted exactly what sin the's copyright and trade mark say here several times.
it is clear that sin the can not force any person to not teach any of the material.
you may not call it shaolin do:
ok fine so what ... i could call it shaolin dude.
you may not teach the material in the same order:
i say this would be hard to enforce. much of the material is from other sources such as jrq bagua. jiang wrote his book about his bagua many years ago from what i understand his daughter made the drawings of him doing his bagua for the book.
well sin the claims he wrote "classical pakua" look at the attached picture of the notes i was given. it says "by master sin the' all rights reserved may not be reprinted with out author consent".
sin the uses the same pictures and almost the exact same text but sin the makes some translation errors such as "wild ducks came out as a herd" instead of wild ducks come out as a flock" and small errors like that but the text is largely the same and the drawings are exactly the same.
it is nice that he made a translation but the way he presents it is as if he wrote it.
how could sin the stop anyone from teaching classical pakua? even if he thinks the order of moves are what is protected since the same form is available from many sources. and there are several available translations????????
how the hell does he think he can tell people they can not teach yang tai chi? it is not "his" if in know it it is mine.
now if a person opened a school called "shaolin do" and they taught the same things in the exact same order maybe sin the could say something but beyond that in my opinion no.